The Competition Authority - www.tca.ie

The Competition Authority Logo


 

The Competition Authority v. Irish Medical Organisation

Page Attachments

 
On 25 May 2007, the Competition Authority agreed settlement terms with the Irish Medical Organisation (IMO) in relation to legal proceedings initiated in the High Court by the Competition Authority. The IMO is the national representative body for general medical practitioners (GPs) and non-consultant hospital doctors, in addition to 800 consultant members. In February 2005, the Competition Authority began an investigation into allegations of price-fixing by the IMO in relation to the provision of Private Medical Attendant Reports (PMARs) to life assurance companies. It was further alleged that the IMO threatened to withdraw these services if the life assurance companies did not pay a proposed increase in fees.

The Competition Authority carried out an investigation into whether or not the IMO had acted in breach of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Arising from that investigation, the Competition Authority initiated proceedings in the High Court against the IMO claiming that the IMO’s conduct had as its object the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in the market for medical information provided to life insurance companies and/or had as its effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in the market for medical information provided to life insurance companies and the downstream market for life insurance.

Under the settlement terms the IMO agreed:

1. To refrain from recommending or expressing an opinion on fees to be provided to life insurance companies by GPs or otherwise facilitating co-ordinated behaviour with regard to fees for these services.

2. Not to directly or indirectly instruct or recommend to GPs to withhold services from life insurance companies in breach of competition law, or otherwise facilitate co-ordinated behaviour in breach of competition law regarding the response of GPs to particular proposals on fees to be charged for services provided to life insurance companies by GPs.

3. Not to issue any communications to its members that directly or indirectly instruct or recommend to GPs to withhold services from life insurance companies in breach of competition law, or otherwise facilitate co-ordinated behaviour in breach of competition law regarding the response of GPs to particular proposals on fees to be charged for services provided to life insurance companies by GPs, including but not limited to PMARs and medical examinations.

4. Not to directly or indirectly discourage its members from individually negotiating with life insurance companies.

5. Not to indicate to life insurance companies that its members will refuse to supply services to the life insurance companies if they do not accede to the fee levels and/or increases sought by the IMO.

6. Not to encourage, suggest, advise or otherwise induce or attempt to induce any third party to engage in any action that would be prohibited if carried out by the IMO by the terms of this agreement.

As part of the settlement terms, the IMO agreed to payment of the Competition Authority’s costs in the proceedings. The Settlement Agreement is in full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the alleged facts and matters pleaded in these proceedings, but does not constitute any admission of a breach of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 or of any of the alleged facts.

Follow CompetitionIrl on Twitter

Date Printed: 05 February 2012

© The Competition Authority 2012